目的:比较董氏奇穴联合火龙罐与常规针刺联合TDP照射治疗风寒型面瘫的临床疗效的差异。方法:选取70例风寒型面瘫患者,随机分为治疗组和对照组,两组各35例。治疗组采用董氏奇穴联合火龙罐疗法,对照组采用常规针刺联合TDP照射疗法,两组均治疗3周。分别于治疗前、治疗1周、治疗3周结束后评定面神经瘫痪分级量表(House-Brackmann,H-B)评分、面神经功能恢复评定标准评分、改良Portmann评分、面部残疾指数量表-躯体功能指数量表(Facial Disability Index Physical Function Index Scale,FDIP)评分、面部残疾指数量表-社会生活功能量表(Facial Disability Index Social Life Function Scale,FDIS)评分,进行临床评价。结果:两组治疗前H-B评分、面神经功能恢复评定标准评分、改良Portmann评分、FDIP评分、FDIS评分的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗1周后、治疗3周后,两组H-B评分、面神经功能恢复评定标准评分、改良Portmann评分、FDIP评分、FDIS评分均降低(均P<0.05)。观察组总有效率高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义。结论:董氏奇穴联合火龙罐与常规针刺联合TDP照射治疗风寒型面瘫均有效,董氏奇穴联合火龙罐疗法较常规针刺联合TDP照射疗法恢复快。因此,董氏奇穴联合火龙罐疗法在治疗风寒型面瘫方面的疗效明显优于常规针刺联合TDP照射疗法。
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of moxibustion at B ihuì（百会 GV 20） combined with penetration needling in treatment of intractable facial paralysis. Methods Sixty patients with intractable facial paralysis included in the study were divided into two groups according to the random number table, with 30 patients in observation group（group A）, and 30 patients in control group（group B）. Moxibustion at GV 20 combined with penetration needling were adopted in group A, and simple penetration needling was applied in group B. Once daily, thirty days of treatment were required. The House Brackmann（H-B） facial nerve function grading and improvement of clinical symptoms were observed. Results The H-B function grading and improvement of clinical symptoms in group A were superior to group B, and the difference was statistically significant（P〈0.05）. Conclusion The clinical efficacy of moxibustion at GV 20 combined with penetration needling in treatment of intractable facial paralysis is definite, and the treatment method is deserving of clinical promotion.
