目的探讨自体富血小板血浆(platelet-rich plasma,PRP)联合骨搬移技术在治疗胫骨缺损方面的有效性及安全性。方法采用前瞻性随机对照单盲的方法,选取2013年1月至2015年3月因创伤、感染因素造成的胫骨骨缺损的28例患者,采用随机数表加密闭信封方法将全部患者随机分为两组,其中PRP联合骨搬移组(简称PRP组)15例及单纯骨搬移组13例。PRP组15例,男12例,女3例;平均年龄40.9岁;平均骨缺损长度7.1cm;创伤性6例,感染性9例。骨搬移组13例,男10例,女3例;平均年龄37.7岁;平均骨缺损长度6.5cm;创伤性3例,感染性10例。采用Ilizarov方法研究与应用学会(Association of the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov,ASAMI)分类评价骨愈合及下肢功能情况,并记录两组外固定支架指数(患者佩戴外固定支架的时间除以骨搬移长度或骨延长长度)、并发症及术后疼痛情况[采用视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)进行评价]等。结果PRP组和骨搬移组的平均随访时间分别为21.8个月和23.2个月。PRP组15例骨缺损均愈合,愈合时间为平均183.2d;骨搬移组13例患者中,11例骨缺损愈合,愈合时间平均218.6d,2例骨缺损未愈合,经再次手术打通髓腔,植骨后愈合。术后疼痛VAS评分:术后第1天,PRP组(3.33±2.58)分,骨搬移组(4.46±2.73)分;第7天,PRP组(2.67±2.09)分,骨搬移组(3.00±2.20)分;术后两周,PRP组(1.46±1.77)分,骨搬移组(2.62±2.72)分;各时间点两组比较差异均无统计学意义。两组外固定支架指数,PRP组为(37.9±7.7)d/cm,骨搬移组为(46.9±13.7)d/cm,两组比较差异有统计学意义。按照ASAMI评价骨折愈合情况,PRP组9例评价为优,5例为良,优良率为93.3%(14/15);骨搬移组7例评价为优,3例为良,优良率为76.9�
Many studies have reported the relationship between CXCL12 G801 A polymorphism and cancer risk, with conflicting results. In this study, we tried to clarify the possibility that this polymorphism may increase cancer risk by conducting an updated meta-analysis. Pub Med and EMbase were searched for case-control studies regarding the association of the gene polymorphism and cancer risk. Data were extracted and odds ratios(ORs) with 95% confidence intervals(95% CIs) were used to assess the strength of the association. Heterogeneity among articles and publication bias was also assessed. Significantly increased risk for cancer was found(A vs. G: OR=1.26, 95% CI=1.13-1.40, P〈0.01; AA+AG vs. GG: OR=1.33, 95% CI=1.16-1.52, P〈0.01). In subgroup analysis, statistically elevated cancer risk was found in both Asian and Caucasian populations(for Asian, AA+AG vs. GG: OR=1.74, 95% CI=1.22-2.47, P〈0.01; for Caucasian, AA+AG vs. GG: OR=1.24, 95% CI=1.09-1.42, P〈0.01). Our result indicated that CXCL12 G801 A polymorphism is a risk factor for cancer. To validate the finding, further large-size case-control studies are warranted.