Objective Waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and waist-to-height ratio, which are the indicators or measures of abdominal adiposity, have long been hypothesized to increase the risk of stroke; yet evidence accumulated till date is not conclusive. Here, we conducted a dose-response meta-analysis to summarize evidences of the association between these measures of abdominal adiposity and the risk of stroke. Methods PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to May 2015. Two investigators independently conducted the study selection and data extraction. Dose-response relationships were assessed by the generalized least squares trend estimation, while the summary effect estimates were evaluated by the use of fixed- or random-effect models. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the potential sources of heterogeneity and the robustness of the pooled estimation. Publication bias of the literature was evaluated using Begg＇s and Egger＇s test. Results Altogether 15 prospective cohort studies were identified in this study. The summary of relative risks （95% confidence intervals） of stroke for the highest versus the lowest categories was 1.28 （1.18-1.40） for waist circumference, 1.32 （1.21-1.44） for waist-to-hip ratio, and 1.49 （1.24-1.78） for waist-to-height ratio. For a 10-cm increase in waist circumference, the relative risk of stroke increased by 10%; for a 0.1-unit increase in waist-to-hip ratio, the relative risk increased by 16%; and for a 0.05-unit increase in waist-to-height ratio, the relative risk increased by 13%. There was evidence of a nonlinear association between waist-to-hip ratio and stroke risk, Pnonlinearity=0.028, Conclusion Findings from our meta-analysis indicated that waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio were positively associated with the risk of stroke, particularly ischemic stroke.
Objective To study the relationship between dyslipidemia and outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods Data about 2 568 patients with acute ischemic stroke were collected from 4 hospitals in Shandong Province from January 2006 to December 2008. National Institute of Health Stroke Scale （NIHSS） 〉10 at discharge or death was defined as the outcome. Effect of dyslipidemia on outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke was analyzed by multivariate logistic regression analysis and propensity score-adjusted analysis, respectively. Results The serum levels of TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C were significantly associated with the outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and propensity score-adjusted analysis showed that the ORs and 95% CIs were 3.013 （1.259, 7.214）/2.655 （1.298, 5.43）, 3.157 （1.306, 7.631）/3.405 （1.621, 7.154）, and 0.482 （0.245, 0.946）/0.51 （0.282, O.921）, respectively, for patients with acute ischemic stroke. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed no significant difference in observed and predicted risk in patients with acute ischemic stroke （chi-square=8.235, P=0.411）. Conclusion Serum levels of TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C are positively related with the outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
XU TianZHANG Jin TaoYANG MeiZHANG HuanLIU Wen QingKONG YanXU TanZHANG Yong Hong
Background Many studies have suggested that C-reactive protein （CRP） and blood lipids are associated with hypertension and cardiovascular disease （CVD）.However,few studies discussed the combined action of CRP and blood lipids on the risk of hypertension and prehypertension.This study aimed to investigate the combined action of CRP and lipid profiles on the risk of hypertension and prehypertension in Mongolian adults from Inner Mongolia,China.Methods The systolic and diastolic blood pressure,height,weight and waist circumference were measured and factors such as smoking,alcohol intake,family history of hypertension,etc.,were investigated and CRP,low-density lipoprotein cholesterol （LDL-C）,triglycerides （TG） were tested for 2 534 Mongolian adults aged ≥20 years.The subjects were divided into four subgroups,namely CRP 〈median and LDL-C （TG） 〈median subgroup,CRP 〈median and LDL-C （TG） 〉median subgroup,CRP 〉median and LDL-C （TG） 〈median subgroup and CRP 〉median and LDL-C （TG） 〉median subgroup.The ORs （95% C/s） of hypertension and prehypertension for the subgroups were calculated by univariate and multivariate analysis.Results The multivariate adjusted ORs （95%CIs） of hypertension/prehypertension were 1.389 （0.979-1.970）/1.1 51（0.865-1.531）,1.666 （1.159-2.394）/1.431 （1.060-1.930）,1.756 （1.242-2.484）/ 1.770 （1.321-2.372）,for CRP 〈median and LDL-C 〉median subgroup,CRP 〉median and LDL-C 〈median subgroup,and CRP 〉median and LDL-C 〉median subgroup,respectively,compared with CRP 〈median and LDL-C 〈median subgroup.Similarly,the multivariate adjusted ORs （95% CIs） of hypertension/prehypertension were 2.032 （1.394-2.963）/1.442 （1.047-1.988）,1.412 （0.960-2.079）/1.596 （1.166-2.184）,and 2.197 （1.595-3.027）/1.730 （1.321-2.266） for CRP 〈median and TG 〉median subgroup,CRP 〉median and TG 〈median subgroup,and CRP 〉median and TG 〉median subgroup,respectively,compared with CRP 〈median and TG 〈media
