民法典对动产担保制度采取了形式主义与功能主义相结合的立法模式,这一立法模式引发了融资租赁交易中出租人享有的是所有权还是担保物权的争论,进而导致承租人破产时出租人的行权路径有所不同,即出租人享有的是破产取回权还是破产别除权。基于此,本文将研究视角限定在承租人破产时出租人的权利救济,重点分析了普通租赁合同和融资租赁合同语境下承租人破产出租人的救济路径,旨在厘清出租人的权利基础从而更好地保障出租人权利。The Civil Code adopts a legislative model combining formalism and functionalism for the movable property security system, which has triggered a debate over whether the lessor enjoys ownership or security interest in financial leasing transactions, which in turn leads to a different exercise path for the lessor when the lessee goes bankrupt, that is, whether the lessor enjoys the right of bankruptcy recovery or the right of bankruptcy exclusion. Based on this, this paper limits the research perspective to the lessor’s rights and remedies when the lessee goes bankrupt and focuses on analyzing the relief path of the lessee bankruptcy lessor in the context of ordinary lease contracts and financial lease contracts, aiming to clarify the basis of the lessor’s rights and better protect the rights of the lessor.
